|
Post by Ava on Oct 27, 2020 23:43:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ava on Oct 28, 2020 0:27:10 GMT
Re: Haiti
For the most part, it appears that lockdowns over-protect affluent countries from the virus, while crushing vulnerable countries economically and physically. Of course, even within America, homelessness is on the rise, and hunger along with it.
|
|
|
Post by Ava on Oct 28, 2020 14:42:15 GMT
- Number of deaths from Covid itself, currently a little over a million: www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/- Starvation affecting 100x more people: "An additional 100 million people or more could be facing starvation this year, as the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic weakness has combined with the effects of climate change to put many more people at risk." fortune.com/2020/10/26/covid-19-hunger-food-insecurity-coronavirus/Exponentially more children dying of hunger than Covid: Why can't world governments respond to the reality and change direction, to save more lives?
|
|
|
Post by Ava on Oct 28, 2020 15:00:58 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 7:48:07 GMT
Re: Haiti For the most part, it appears that lockdowns over-protect affluent countries from the virus, while crushing vulnerable countries economically and physically. Of course, even within America, homelessness is on the rise, and hunger along with it. Thanks for this thread Ava. Yes, in both middle income and rich countries that don't have good social support structures (USA, India, Brazil), lockdowns have exacerbated inequalities. Joblessness has increased and so has the number of people living below the poverty line. And there is no end in sight.
|
|
|
Post by Ava on Oct 29, 2020 16:19:15 GMT
Thank you @astrokeen .
I think the ends do not justify the means, when the means are totalitarian.
Totalitarianism itself becomes the new end.
And I find it hard to understand how people keep assuming this is all being done for our protection, when so many are clearly not protected at all, but devastated. As you said, no end in sight.
|
|
|
Post by FruityLlama on Nov 1, 2020 17:33:31 GMT
This was a concern I had quite early on when we were being submerged into full on lockdown because there were, and still are, a lot of people adamant that full on lockdowns are the answer to protect people. However, with a little foresight, it's not hard to imagine that the real devastation will come from the economic effects of lockdown rather than Covid itself.
I get that for my country at least, lockdown was done to help stop the NHS from going under, but people have had their cancer treatments delayed and all sorts which really makes me wonder if its worth it.
I'm seeing patients again and most of them just seem really odd these days, as in, you can tell lockdown has exacerbated latent dementia or other memory issues. The sheer boredom and lack of social interaction has made their minds foggy.
I don't think the world leaders are in the wrong for suggesting another lockdown as such...they are under immense pressure but at the same time, I really think we need to start looking at this way more holistically. Are the consequences of lockdown itself worth it if people are starving and losing jobs? And when people are desperate, chaos ensues.
|
|
|
Post by Ava on Jan 12, 2021 1:23:49 GMT
|
|