Post by 12YearsABlob on Oct 24, 2018 21:26:37 GMT
I agree with Miss Mayberry on this one. Some themes are repeated in both, and that part of the relationship is very prominent. Some themes are only present in one or the other. These are trickier - but IMO, the composite shows the combined energies and the Davison seems to show how they manifest.
That's not to say the composite doesn't show how they manifest, it (seems to be) more of a "we feel this way about our relationship" chart. Or the potentials for your energies mixing in certain ways. Whereas the Davison shows what influences make it through into the actual relationship.
You know how people say a relationship 'takes on a life of its own'? That seems to be what the Davison is talking about.
Will try to get back with more examples, but - off the top of my head: My old flatmate.
Composite: Sun opposing Moon. Sun conjunct most other planets, in harmonious aspect to outer planets.
Davison: Sun conjunct Moon, now both part of the stellium.
With full moon composites (& Davisons), the relationship itself is a bit manic, like the full moon. Emotions run high and you're intensely involved but also kind of insular - in your own bubble, protective of each other's flaws. Sun conjunct moon is effortless. You just know how to fall into step with each other, know when to compromise. You're not afraid of asserting yourself - if you even have to. So, in the above example - we seem like polar opposites, very different people. But we have our comfort level with each other is unparalleled. It makes living together very easy (and you know how hard that can be).
*Well, even the full moon chart would make living together 'natural', except that the people there would settle into their respective roles. With the conjunction, they can switch back n forth or have a lot of overlap and not even notice.
Kay, not sure if that example made much sense.. The idea was that we come together as 'full moon' and function as 'new moon'.
Anyway, point being - I like to take both charts into consideration.
That's not to say the composite doesn't show how they manifest, it (seems to be) more of a "we feel this way about our relationship" chart. Or the potentials for your energies mixing in certain ways. Whereas the Davison shows what influences make it through into the actual relationship.
You know how people say a relationship 'takes on a life of its own'? That seems to be what the Davison is talking about.
Will try to get back with more examples, but - off the top of my head: My old flatmate.
Composite: Sun opposing Moon. Sun conjunct most other planets, in harmonious aspect to outer planets.
Davison: Sun conjunct Moon, now both part of the stellium.
With full moon composites (& Davisons), the relationship itself is a bit manic, like the full moon. Emotions run high and you're intensely involved but also kind of insular - in your own bubble, protective of each other's flaws. Sun conjunct moon is effortless. You just know how to fall into step with each other, know when to compromise. You're not afraid of asserting yourself - if you even have to. So, in the above example - we seem like polar opposites, very different people. But we have our comfort level with each other is unparalleled. It makes living together very easy (and you know how hard that can be).
*Well, even the full moon chart would make living together 'natural', except that the people there would settle into their respective roles. With the conjunction, they can switch back n forth or have a lot of overlap and not even notice.
Kay, not sure if that example made much sense.. The idea was that we come together as 'full moon' and function as 'new moon'.
Anyway, point being - I like to take both charts into consideration.
